Final Design

 

Form my final design, I decided to choose the arch bridge that utilized a pulley and tack system. I chose the arch design because it was easier to span the 190 foot span cause by the river and it would help me not only support the walkway throughout the span, but also any mechanism I was going to use to lift a section of the bridge. For the movement of my bridge, I decided to use a system of weights being on track lifting a section of the bridge by a system of pulleys. In my final design, I chose to have my opening closer to one of the edges of the river rather than the center because it would be easier to supper the lifting mechanism.

 

 

Original Design:

 

 

 

 

 

Preliminary Final Design:

 

From this design, I realized the bridge could not be the same thickness at both end due to one side having to support a larger load. This is why in my final design I decided not only to make the side with the heavier load thicker, but also added more structural support to that side by having an extra brace on the outside of it. Another transformation done to my design was going from a set of pulleys to only two per side. This change came about because it would be easier to pull the cables. Because of this, there had to be extra support under these pulleys. For the final design, I had decided to use an Archimedes cylinder to lift water from the river to weight to pull the pulleys, because of this reinforcements in the arch had to be made to support this extra weight.

 

 

Final Design:

 

 

South Elevation:

 

 

East Elevation:

 

 

North Elevation:

 


 

 

 

3D Views:

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

Jose Solorzano

soloj@farmingdale.edu

 

Homepage